<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Input Tags In Forms Not Valid XHTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=input-tags-in-forms-not-valid-xhtml</link>
	<description>It&#039;s not enough to be smart; you have to actually know things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:27:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspiraller</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-419362</link>
		<dc:creator>inspiraller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-419362</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately to validate as xhtml strict the input must actually be inside a fieldset tag.

To validated AAA it the fieldset must have a legend tag, and all un hidden inputs should have labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately to validate as xhtml strict the input must actually be inside a fieldset tag.</p>
<p>To validated AAA it the fieldset must have a legend tag, and all un hidden inputs should have labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen P Suthar</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-410740</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen P Suthar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-410740</guid>
		<description>Sorry the   was not printed....  its


 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry the   was not printed&#8230;.  its</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen P Suthar</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-410734</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen P Suthar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 07:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-410734</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s right. We need to put the input type=hidden block in a  like below... to make the code xHtml validate.


		&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;ip&quot; value=&quot;&quot; /&gt;
		&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;httpref&quot; value=&quot;&quot; /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s right. We need to put the input type=hidden block in a  like below&#8230; to make the code xHtml validate.</p>
<p>		&lt;input type=&#8221;hidden&#8221; name=&#8221;ip&#8221; value=&#8221;" /&gt;<br />
		&lt;input type=&#8221;hidden&#8221; name=&#8221;httpref&#8221; value=&#8221;" /&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Pachl</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-409848</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Pachl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-409848</guid>
		<description>Instead of using …, why not use the simpler ...? It makes the arguments above that are agaisnt fieldset hack, void.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of using …, why not use the simpler &#8230;? It makes the arguments above that are agaisnt fieldset hack, void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-263788</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-263788</guid>
		<description>I use Strict XHTML in my doctype, as I feel it renders more accurately in all browsers. Coupled with Yahoo&#039;s reset CSS, it makes my job much easier when it comes time to QA. As for input tags not validating inside of a form tag, a sound reason I can think of for that is you may not always use input tags within a form. If I want to place a button on my site, I will use input type=button and use CSS to style it. Works for me, and keeps it accessible if the CSS or images are not loaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Strict XHTML in my doctype, as I feel it renders more accurately in all browsers. Coupled with Yahoo&#8217;s reset CSS, it makes my job much easier when it comes time to QA. As for input tags not validating inside of a form tag, a sound reason I can think of for that is you may not always use input tags within a form. If I want to place a button on my site, I will use input type=button and use CSS to style it. Works for me, and keeps it accessible if the CSS or images are not loaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaschu vs. the 7au : links for 2007-05-21</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-144515</link>
		<dc:creator>jaschu vs. the 7au : links for 2007-05-21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-144515</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul M. Jones Â» Blog Archive Â» Input Tags In Forms Not Valid XHTML You know, sometimes specs are seemingly stupid. (tags: xhtml webdev) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul M. Jones Â» Blog Archive Â» Input Tags In Forms Not Valid XHTML You know, sometimes specs are seemingly stupid. (tags: xhtml webdev) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two things I just learned about XHTML - Chausse.org</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-78277</link>
		<dc:creator>Two things I just learned about XHTML - Chausse.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-78277</guid>
		<description>[...] You can&#8217;t (legally) use input tags immediately inside form tags - Interestingly, most XHTML tutorials don&#8217;t even acknowledge this.    &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;add to deli.cio.us&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;digg it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can&#8217;t (legally) use input tags immediately inside form tags &#8211; Interestingly, most XHTML tutorials don&#8217;t even acknowledge this.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;add to deli.cio.us&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;digg it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-68997</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-68997</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think you need a legend element under fieldset if you want your page to be valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think you need a legend element under fieldset if you want your page to be valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil w</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-68368</link>
		<dc:creator>phil w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-68368</guid>
		<description>Strict is useful: it indentifies more errors in your markup. Browsers are a poor way to find broken markup.

The catch is that some validation errors are kind of annoying, at least to those of us who need/ have to use non-valid markup sometimes. There are ways around that, but it&#039;s not a big hassle, so I use &quot;strict&quot; and live with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strict is useful: it indentifies more errors in your markup. Browsers are a poor way to find broken markup.</p>
<p>The catch is that some validation errors are kind of annoying, at least to those of us who need/ have to use non-valid markup sometimes. There are ways around that, but it&#8217;s not a big hassle, so I use &#8220;strict&#8221; and live with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rodger</title>
		<link>http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/221/comment-page-1#comment-56229</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=221#comment-56229</guid>
		<description>I think the page you intended to link to was this:
http://www.december.com/html/x1/element/form.html
It has the XHTML Strict definition, and it does not list input as a valid content for form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the page you intended to link to was this:<br />
<a href="http://www.december.com/html/x1/element/form.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.december.com/html/x1/element/form.html</a><br />
It has the XHTML Strict definition, and it does not list input as a valid content for form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

