Comments on: Running The Symfony 2 Benchmarks

By: Hacktard » Preloading vs lazy loading

Hacktard » Preloading vs lazy loading — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:40:37 +0000

[...] symfony2 looks pretty heavy based on its features. I tried searching for the post again and found a post from Paul M Jones The post mentions that symfony2 uses preloading and when solar is made with preloading and the same [...]

By: Symfony2 – retour d’expérience | Chroniques d'un webliver

Symfony2 – retour d’expérience | Chroniques d'un webliver — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:05:51 +0000

[...] }); }Vous en trouverez partout sur la toile et notamment là, celui-ci date un peu mais reste intéressant [↩]pas éculée du tout [↩]moins barbare [...]

By: Hari K T

Hari K T — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:06:05 +0000

There is a typo in the link . You missed .com ;)

paul-m-jones.com/public/fabiens-benches.sh

Thank you for the great article and your time.

By: Quora

Quora — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:26:16 +0000

Which PHP framework scales best?…

Scaling shouldn’t be a determining factor for what PHP framework you should choose because all of the frameworks will be able to handle that amount of traffic. I don’t know how many requests per page that boils down to, but 7 million page views/day i…

By: jan

jan — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:49:36 +0000

Hi!

This is an old discussion. But did anybody think of APC regarding “compilation” of php classes? If you have APC, how much does this comlilation matter? I think nothing.

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:22:23 +0000

Yes! Definitely would be interested in a Django/Rails/Spring comparison!

By: Harold Bunderstrom

Harold Bunderstrom — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:33:50 +0000

Great set of benchmarks – must have been a lot of work. Thanks.

I’d really like to see a head-to-head between Django, Rails, Spring and some of these PHP frameworks. I can’t find any that are up-to-date.

By: pmjones

pmjones — Sun, 02 May 2010 15:09:00 +0000

Joh,

I followed the instructions as posted by Fabien. He did not include PDO setup as part of those instructions. Thus, the report he shows cannot be reproduced as-is. In turn, that means the problem is with his test as he described it.

On the other hand, my tests come with working instructions and are repeatable by anyone as-is. Try them yourself to see if they can be trusted.

Finally, while Flow3 appeared to require PDO, the problem with Lithium appeared to be a mistaken target line. These are two different kinds of errors. If there is incompetence to be found, one can find it in your comprehension of the article.

By: Joh

Joh — Sun, 02 May 2010 10:05:30 +0000

This post says that Lithium and Flow3 need PDO. It also declares that these two frameworks do not work in Fabian’s test. I am sorry but this is no a problem of Fabian’s tests. If you do not have PDO installed, it does not means it is a problem of your tests.

Your tests cannot be trusted. They look incompetent.

By: Tormi Talv

Tormi Talv — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:11:39 +0000

How is it possible that a framework(Lithium) is faster that baseline-html?

I’ve got to test it myself!